Biden's Cognitive Decline Exposed in 'Original Sin' Book Discussion

Unveiling the Cover-Up Surrounding Biden's Health

Megyn Kelly hosts a compelling discussion on her YouTube channel with Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, co-authors of the newly released book 'Original Sin.' The conversation, posted on May 21, 2025, dives deep into revelations about President Joe Biden's cognitive decline and the alleged efforts by his inner circle to conceal it from the public. Tapper, a prominent CNN anchor, and Thompson, a seasoned reporter, share insights from their investigative work, shedding light on how Biden's family and loyal aides reportedly shielded his diminished capacity from full public view.

The discussion highlights the gravity of the situation, with Tapper and Thompson detailing how this cover-up unfolded over time. They describe a concerted effort by those closest to Biden to maintain an image of competence, despite evident struggles. This segment of the video, starting around the 5:30 mark, emphasizes the authors' findings that key Democrats and establishment figures were complicit in downplaying Biden's health issues, raising serious questions about transparency in leadership.

Media's Role and Tapper's Reflections

A significant portion of the conversation focuses on the media's involvement in this narrative. Tapper candidly reflects on his own coverage of Biden, including a notable 2020 interview with Lara Trump, which resurfaces in this discussion at approximately the 15:45 mark. He admits to moments of doubt during Biden's June debate performance, sharing what he was thinking behind the scenes as the event unfolded into a public meltdown. Tapper's honesty about the media missing signs of Biden's decline—despite it being, as he puts it, 'in front of their nose'—adds a layer of accountability to the discourse.

The authors also address criticism of their book from various political spectrums. They note that reactions have been polarized, with some accusing them of bias while others praise their courage in tackling such a sensitive topic. This part of the dialogue, around the 25:10 mark, underscores the challenges of reporting on a sitting president's health without appearing partisan, especially in a highly divided political landscape.

Insights from Batya Ungar-Sargon

Later in the video, at about the 35:20 mark, Batya Ungar-Sargon, a columnist for The Free Press, joins the conversation to offer her perspective. She argues that the cover-up was not just limited to Biden's immediate circle but extended to top Democrats and much of the corporate media. Ungar-Sargon criticizes the establishment for prioritizing political strategy over honesty, suggesting that this lack of transparency undermined public trust. Her commentary reinforces the book's central thesis that the failure to acknowledge Biden's reduced cognitive powers had significant implications for the nation’s political direction.

She further elaborates on how this situation reflects broader issues within political and media institutions. Ungar-Sargon points out that protecting Biden's image seemed to take precedence over informing the American public, a stance she finds deeply troubling. Her remarks resonate with concerns about accountability and the role of journalism in holding power to account.

Tapper's Strong Comparison to Historical Scandal

One of the most striking moments in the discussion comes when Tapper compares the cover-up of Biden's decline to the Watergate scandal. Around the 45:00 mark, he states, 'It is a scandal...and maybe even worse than Watergate in some ways.' This bold assertion, also reported in recent interviews with Piers Morgan, highlights the severity of the allegations in 'Original Sin.' Tapper's comparison suggests that the implications of concealing a president's health issues could rival one of the most infamous political scandals in American history, emphasizing the potential erosion of democratic principles.

The discussion on Megyn Kelly's platform provides a detailed look into 'Original Sin,' offering viewers a chance to hear directly from the authors about their motivations and findings. The book, as discussed, aims to document a critical chapter in recent political history, focusing on how personal and institutional loyalties may have compromised public interest. This conversation serves as a call to prioritize transparency and integrity in governance, resonating with those who value straightforward reporting on matters of national importance.