Biden's Trump Trial Stunt and Hillary's Election Excuses Exposed

Biden Campaign's Controversial Move Outside Trump Trial

On May 28, 2024, Megyn Kelly, joined by Stu Burguiere of BlazeTV's 'Stu Does America' and Dave Marcus, a columnist for Fox News and The Daily Mail, tackled the Biden campaign's decision to hold a press conference outside the ongoing Trump trial in New York City. This event featured actor Robert De Niro and January 6 police officers, a move seen as an attempt to politicize the legal proceedings against President Donald J. Trump. Kelly and her guests discussed how this stunt reflects the desperation of the Biden campaign, especially as their failures become increasingly apparent to the public.

At around the 5:30 mark of the video, Kelly highlighted the optics of using such figures to draw attention to the trial, suggesting it was a calculated effort to sway public opinion against Trump. Burguiere noted that this move underscores a lack of substantive achievements to campaign on, forcing Biden's team to resort to spectacle over policy substance. Marcus added that the timing, coinciding with closing arguments in the trial, was no accident, aiming to keep negative attention on Trump.

Trump Defense Team's Closing Arguments Target Cohen's Credibility

The discussion then shifted to the Trump defense team's closing arguments on the same day, focusing heavily on discrediting Michael Cohen, a key witness in the case. At approximately the 15:45 mark, Kelly shared how Trump's lawyer labeled Cohen as 'the MVP of liars,' emphasizing his lack of credibility due to past inconsistencies and lies under oath. The defense's strategy was to paint Cohen as an unreliable narrator, hoping to sway the New York City jury toward a not-guilty verdict.

Burguiere pointed out that while the jury's leanings in a heavily Democratic area like NYC could be challenging, the defense's focus on Cohen's documented falsehoods might resonate with jurors seeking factual clarity over political bias. Marcus expressed concern over the judge's rulings, which he believed were structured to hinder the defense's chances, potentially influencing the trial's outcome unfairly. The panel agreed that many voters are capable of separating Trump's policies, which they view as effective, from personal character attacks amplified by such legal battles.

Hillary Clinton's Persistent Blame Game for 2016 Loss

Another significant topic covered, starting around the 25:10 mark, was Hillary Clinton's latest explanation for her 2016 election loss to Trump. Clinton recently attributed her defeat to women voters, citing misogyny and other external factors rather than reflecting on her own campaign shortcomings. Kelly and her guests critiqued this narrative, with Burguiere calling it a refusal to accept personal responsibility after nearly a decade. Marcus echoed this sentiment, noting that Clinton's persistent blame-shifting alienates even potential sympathizers who might have supported her initially.

This discussion highlighted a broader pattern of deflecting accountability among certain political figures, contrasting sharply with the current administration's focus under President Trump on delivering results over excuses. The panel emphasized that voters are more concerned with present leadership and tangible outcomes than revisiting past electoral grievances.

Biden Campaign's Misleading Ads Against Trump

Lastly, at about the 35:20 mark, Kelly addressed a new Biden campaign ad painting Trump as racist, which the panel deemed dishonest and full of misinformation. They dissected the ad's claims, clarifying the context of Trump's past comments to counter the narrative being pushed. Burguiere stressed that such tactics reveal panic within the Biden camp, especially as they run these ads in unlikely places like New York, a traditionally Democratic stronghold.

Marcus added that this approach risks backfiring by alienating voters tired of negative campaigning over substantive debate. The panel agreed that under President Trump's leadership, the focus remains on policy achievements that benefit Americans, rather than engaging in divisive smear tactics. This segment underscored a commitment to truth and fairness in political discourse, aligning with values of integrity and accountability that resonate deeply with many citizens seeking genuine leadership.

In summary, the episode provided a comprehensive look at current political maneuvers and historical reflections, critiquing actions that undermine fair play in both legal and electoral arenas. Kelly, Burguiere, and Marcus offered insights into how these events reflect broader challenges in maintaining trust and focus on what truly matters to the American public.