Diddy Verdict Shocks with Not Guilty on Major Charges, Kohberger Plea Deal
Diddy’s Trial Outcome Stuns with Mixed Verdicts
The recent verdict in the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs has left many reeling, as he was found not guilty on the most serious charges against him. In a detailed discussion on Megyn Kelly’s YouTube channel, posted on July 2, 2025, Kelly provided her immediate reaction to the news. Diddy was acquitted on counts 1, 2, and 4, but found guilty on counts 3 and 5. This outcome is seen as a significant victory for Diddy, despite the two guilty verdicts. Legal experts Arthur Aidala and Phil Holloway joined Kelly to break down the implications of this ruling, noting that the not guilty verdicts on the major charges represent a huge win for the defense.
At around the 5:30 mark, Aidala highlighted how the trial’s progression might have hinted at this outcome, pointing to specific moments where the defense seemed to gain traction. Holloway added, near the 10:15 timestamp, that Diddy’s behavior in the courtroom post-verdict was notably outrageous, raising questions about whether the jury’s decision fully captured the gravity of the allegations. The experts debated if the jury might have erred in their judgment, though they acknowledged the complexity of the case and the evidence presented.
Behind the Scenes of Diddy’s Defense
Further into the conversation, around the 15:40 mark, Kelly and her guests discussed how Diddy celebrated the ruling, reflecting a sense of relief and triumph. The legal analysts emphasized that while the not guilty verdicts on most counts are a major reprieve, the guilty findings on two counts still carry consequences. They refrained from speculating beyond the facts, focusing instead on the observable reactions and legal ramifications as they stand. This segment of the discussion underscored the unpredictable nature of high-profile trials and the impact of jury perception on the final outcome.
Bryan Kohberger’s Plea Deal in Idaho Murders Case
Shifting focus, the video also covered the live plea hearing for Bryan Kohberger, accused in the brutal 2022 murders of four Idaho college students: Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen, and Kaylee Goncalves. At approximately the 25:10 mark, Kelly was joined by Howard Blum, author of 'When the Night Comes Falling,' and legal expert Matt Murphy to discuss this development. Kohberger agreed to plead guilty to all counts in exchange for avoiding the death penalty, opting instead for life in prison without the possibility of parole.
The plea deal has sparked significant controversy, particularly among the victims’ families. Around the 30:45 timestamp, Blum noted a profound disconnect between the prosecution and the families, with at least one family expressing anger over the decision. An attorney for the family of Kaylee Goncalves confirmed that prosecutors had informed them of the deal via email and letter, a move that left the family upset and feeling sidelined. The discussion highlighted how this plea deal raises ethical questions about justice for the victims, especially given the prosecution’s earlier insistence on having strong evidence to pursue the death penalty.
Emotional Moments and Procedural Missteps in Kohberger Hearing
During the plea hearing coverage, starting at about the 40:20 mark, Murphy pointed out several striking moments. The prosecutor’s emotional display, including visible tears while addressing the court, seemed performative to some observers. Additionally, a notable error occurred when the judge mispronounced one of the victim’s names, adding to the families’ frustration. These incidents compounded the sense of dissatisfaction with how the case has been handled, as discussed by Kelly and her guests.
Near the 50:00 mark, the panel addressed speculation that Kohberger may have accepted the plea deal to spare his parents from testifying, though this remains unconfirmed. They also touched on concerns about whether Kohberger could potentially be released in the future, though the terms of life without parole suggest otherwise. The conversation stayed grounded in the known details, avoiding unsupported theories about Kohberger’s motivations or future legal maneuvers.
Reflecting on Justice and Public Reaction
Both segments of Kelly’s video, spanning over an hour, reflect deep public and legal interest in these cases. The mixed verdict for Diddy and the plea deal for Kohberger have ignited debates about the judicial process and what constitutes justice. For Diddy, the acquittal on major charges offers a reprieve, while for Kohberger, the plea deal closes a chapter on a horrific crime but leaves lingering questions about accountability and closure for the victims’ families. These discussions, rooted in real-time analysis by legal experts, provide a window into the complexities of high-stakes legal battles in America today.
Dues are $12 per year. Member benefits:
✅ Ad-Free Website Viewing
✅ Advocacy for Republican Seniors
✅ 120+ Senior Discounts
✅ Member Only Newsletters