Fox Host Charlie Hurt Blasts New Woke Term for Women on Ingraham Angle

Charlie Hurt Denounces Latest Woke Language Shift

On January 24, 2025, Fox & Friends Weekend co-host Charlie Hurt appeared on The Ingraham Angle to discuss a new term being used in some circles to refer to women. During the segment, Hurt expressed strong disapproval of what he described as an overreach of political correctness, arguing that such language changes are unnecessary and confusing to many Americans who value straightforward communication. His critique focused on the broader cultural implications of adopting new terminology that he believes strays from traditional norms.

Hurt emphasized that the term, which was not explicitly named in the available content but referred to as a 'woke phrase,' represents a trend of altering language to fit ideological agendas. He suggested that this shift is part of a larger pattern that many find alienating, particularly those who prioritize clarity over evolving social constructs. His comments resonated with the show's theme of pushing back against what the hosts see as excessive progressive influence in everyday life.

Discussion on The Ingraham Angle

Hosted by Laura Ingraham, The Ingraham Angle is known for its direct approach to current events, often highlighting perspectives that challenge mainstream narratives. In this episode, Ingraham provided a platform for Hurt to dissect the implications of the new phrase. While specific details of the term itself were not widely reported in accessible sources, the conversation underscored a shared concern among the show's audience about preserving traditional language and resisting what they view as forced cultural changes.

Hurt's appearance on the program, as captured in the YouTube video posted on January 24, 2025, highlighted his frustration with the direction of public discourse. At one point during the segment, he made a broader point about societal norms, stating that even young children understand basic concepts of identity without needing complex redefinitions. This perspective aligns with the values of many viewers who appreciate a no-nonsense approach to such topics.

The discussion on The Ingraham Angle reflects a growing sentiment among some Americans who feel that language is being reshaped in ways that do not reflect their lived experiences. Hurt's critique, delivered with his characteristic bluntness, pointed to the disconnect between those advocating for new terms and the everyday people who may struggle to keep up with or accept these changes. He argued that such linguistic shifts often prioritize ideology over practicality, creating unnecessary barriers in communication.

This segment of the show also tied into larger themes often explored on Fox News programming, including the preservation of traditional values and resistance to what is perceived as overreach by progressive movements. Hurt's comments were framed as a defense of common sense, appealing to an audience that values stability in cultural norms. The conversation avoided delving into specific policy debates, focusing instead on the personal and societal impact of language evolution.

Broader Implications for Public Discourse

The reaction to this new term, as discussed by Hurt, raises questions about how language shapes public perception and interaction. While the exact phrase was not detailed in the available content, the intensity of Hurt's response suggests it struck a nerve with both him and the show's audience. His insistence on maintaining clear, traditional terminology reflects a desire to protect a shared understanding of fundamental concepts, which he believes are being eroded by constant redefinition.

The segment also served as a reminder of the role media platforms like The Ingraham Angle play in amplifying voices that challenge prevailing cultural trends. By giving airtime to perspectives like Hurt's, the show reinforces its commitment to representing viewers who feel sidelined by rapid societal shifts. This approach has long been a hallmark of the program, which continues to draw significant viewership for its unapologetic stance on contentious issues.

As of the posting date of the video, January 24, 2025, this discussion added to an ongoing national conversation about identity, language, and cultural values. While specific data on viewership or direct quotes beyond the general themes were not accessible in the searched content, the segment's focus on resisting new terminology clearly aimed to resonate with those who share similar concerns. Hurt's passionate delivery underscored the importance of these debates in shaping how Americans understand and communicate with one another.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
From the American Association of Retired Republicans   
Support conservative advocacy for Social Security & Medicare, plus get access to senior discounts and news & information to age well. Dues are $12 per year.

Member benefits include:

βœ… 120+ senior discounts
βœ… Member only newsletters
βœ… Full access to website content

Share this article
The link has been copied!