Jeffrey Sachs Warns of War Risks with Iran and Russia on Carlson Show

Deep State Obsession with Ukraine and Russia

Jeffrey Sachs, a renowned economist and foreign policy expert, recently appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show to discuss the escalating tensions between Ukraine and Russia, as well as the broader implications for U.S. foreign policy. Sachs argues that Ukraine holds a central role in what he describes as a long-standing plan by certain powerful forces within the U.S. government to weaken Russia. At around the 4:51 mark, he delves into how this obsession with diminishing Russian influence has driven much of Western policy, often at great cost to stability in the region.

Sachs traces the roots of this hostility back decades, suggesting that historical animosities and strategic interests have fueled a persistent effort to counter Russian power. He highlights specific policies, such as NATO expansion, as deliberate moves to provoke and encircle Russia, a point he elaborates on near the 23:49 timestamp. This perspective aligns with a broader critique of U.S. actions that, in his view, prioritize geopolitical dominance over peace.

Barriers to Peace in Ukraine

One of the critical topics Sachs addresses is the potential for peace between Ukraine and Russia under President Donald J. Trump’s leadership. At the 31:37 mark, he questions what might be stopping Trump from brokering a resolution to the conflict. Sachs points to entrenched interests within the U.S. government—often referred to as the 'war machine'—that resist de-escalation efforts. He suggests that these forces have historically undermined peace initiatives, including a specific agreement between Russia and Ukraine that was allegedly sabotaged, as discussed around the 38:33 timestamp.

Sachs offers pointed advice to Trump on navigating these challenges, emphasizing the need to prioritize diplomacy over military escalation. Near the 55:28 mark, he references covert operations and intelligence activities that complicate the path to peace. His insights underscore a belief that Trump’s administration could play a pivotal role in ending the conflict if it can overcome internal opposition and focus on American interests first.

Rising Threat of Conflict with Iran

Beyond the Ukraine-Russia dynamic, Sachs warns of a dangerous trajectory toward war with Iran, a topic he explores in depth starting at the 1:19:54 mark. He argues that certain factions within and outside the U.S. government are pushing for conflict, often aligning with foreign interests rather than prioritizing national security. Sachs questions the narrative surrounding Iran’s nuclear capabilities, providing a detailed rebuttal to common claims at about the 1:44:38 timestamp. He asserts that much of the rhetoric is based on misinformation designed to justify military action.

At roughly the 1:59:35 mark, Sachs examines why specific allies might be advocating for confrontation with Iran, suggesting that regional power dynamics play a significant role. He also critiques past U.S. interventions in Iraq and Syria, arguing at the 1:26:04 timestamp that these actions were less about American security and more about serving external agendas. His analysis paints a troubling picture of a nation repeatedly drawn into conflicts that do not align with its core interests.

A Call for Restraint and Reevaluation

Throughout the discussion, Sachs emphasizes the catastrophic risks of escalating tensions into a broader global conflict. Around the 1:17:58 mark, he poses a sobering question about how close the world might be to a full-scale war. His warnings are directed not only at policymakers but also at the American public, urging a reevaluation of the nation’s foreign policy priorities under Trump’s leadership.

Sachs’ conversation with Carlson serves as a stark reminder of the stakes involved in current geopolitical maneuvers. His call for restraint and a focus on diplomacy reflects a deep concern for the future of U.S. security and global stability. As President Trump navigates these complex issues, Sachs’ insights offer a roadmap for avoiding unnecessary conflicts while safeguarding American interests. This interview, rich with historical context and policy critique, underscores the importance of leadership that prioritizes peace over provocation.