Media Bias Exposed: Kamala Harris' Extreme Views Hidden, w/ Buck Sexton & Steve Deace

Media Bias in Debate Coverage Under Scrutiny

On September 12, 2024, Megyn Kelly hosted a compelling discussion on her YouTube channel, joined by Buck Sexton, co-host of The Clay and Buck Show, and Steve Deace, host of the Steve Deace Show. The focus was on the perceived media bias surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris, particularly during and after a recent presidential debate. Kelly and her guests delved into how the press has seemingly downplayed Harris' more extreme policy positions, opting instead to highlight less substantive narratives.

Buck Sexton pointed out early in the conversation, around the 5:30 mark, that the media often allows Harris’ surrogates and friendly outlets to answer tough questions on her behalf. This strategy, he argued, shields her from direct scrutiny while maintaining a polished public image. Sexton also noted the media's fixation on tangential issues, such as the 'eating pets' narrative tied to immigration discussions, rather than addressing policy substance.

Kamala Harris’ Policy Positions Under the Microscope

A significant portion of the discussion centered on Harris’ past stances, including her support for transgender surgery for detained illegal migrants and prisoners. At approximately the 10:15 mark, Sexton highlighted how these positions, which he described as far outside mainstream views, are rarely challenged by major news outlets. Instead, the corporate press appears to ignore or soften these aspects of her record, particularly from her 2019 and 2020 campaign documents like the ACLU questionnaire.

Steve Deace joined the conversation around the 45:20 mark, reinforcing this point by commending CNN for some solid journalism on the ACLU questionnaire but criticizing the broader media for failing to acknowledge the extent of Harris’ earlier positions. Deace emphasized that many reporters still misunderstand or misrepresent Harris’ statements on issues like fracking, which he called a deliberate lie obscured by media narratives.

Illegal Immigration: Media Narratives vs. Reality

The discussion also tackled the media’s handling of illegal immigration, a topic of significant concern for many Americans. Around the 20:40 mark, Sexton addressed how the press often misrepresents the impact of immigration policies under the Biden-Harris administration. He pointed to specific examples, such as Venezuelan gangs in Colorado and Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, arguing that these issues disproportionately harm poorer communities while elites remain unaffected.

Deace added depth to this narrative at about the 50:10 mark, sharing insights on the reality in Springfield, Ohio, and the broader effects of unchecked immigration. He accused the media of suppressing stories that reveal the true strain on American cities, suggesting a deliberate effort to protect certain political agendas over public interest.

Decline of Mainstream Media and Lack of Diversity

Both guests expressed concern over the state of mainstream journalism. Near the 55:30 mark, Deace lamented the lack of ideological diversity in newsrooms, arguing that this homogeneity contributes to biased reporting. He suggested that without varied perspectives, the press cannot accurately reflect the concerns of the broader population, leading to a disconnect between media narratives and public sentiment.

Sexton echoed this sentiment earlier in the episode, around the 15:00 mark, noting that the media machine often works against figures like President Donald J. Trump, who face an uphill battle against coordinated negative coverage. He highlighted missed opportunities during the debate where Trump could have countered Harris more effectively on policy grounds but was overshadowed by media spin.

Body Language Analysis and Debate Impact

Towards the end of the video, at roughly the 1:10:05 mark, body language expert Dr. Donna Van Natten provided analysis of the debate performances. Her insights focused on non-verbal cues from both candidates, offering a unique perspective on how Harris and Trump presented themselves under pressure. While specific details of her analysis were nuanced, they underscored the importance of perception in political contests.

The episode wrapped up with reflections on whether the debate would sway polls significantly. Sexton and Deace agreed that while media bias shapes public perception, the underlying issues—such as immigration and policy extremism—remain critical for voters. This discussion, hosted by Megyn Kelly, serves as a pointed critique of current media practices and a call for greater transparency in political reporting.