Megyn Kelly Slams 60 Minutes' Decline and Michelle Obama's Grievances

Criticism of 60 Minutes' Credibility Collapse

Megyn Kelly, on her show posted on April 24, 2025, delivers a sharp critique of the long-standing news program '60 Minutes,' highlighting what she sees as a significant loss of credibility. She points out the performative resignation of a top executive at the network, suggesting it as a symbolic gesture rather than a meaningful change. Kelly argues that the program has shifted toward a partisan stance, undermining its reputation as a trusted source of journalism. This decline, according to her, is part of a broader trend in corporate media losing public trust due to perceived bias.

Independent Media's Rise Amid Legacy Failures

Joining Kelly on the show, Glenn Greenwald, host of Rumble's 'System Update,' discusses the pivotal moment of the Hunter Biden laptop story around the 15:30 mark. He asserts that this incident marked a turning point, signaling the end of corporate media's influence over public opinion. Greenwald emphasizes that independent media platforms are gaining traction as a direct response to the failures of legacy outlets like '60 Minutes.' He notes that these traditional entities remain out of touch with the average viewer, further fueling the shift toward alternative sources for news and commentary.

Public Rejection of Media Elitism

Greenwald also touches on specific examples of media missteps at approximately the 22:10 timestamp. He mentions the declining ratings of Gayle King on CBS and the poor ticket sales for Katy Perry following a highly publicized but ultimately underwhelming space trip by astronauts. He criticizes the attempt to frame this event through a feminist lens, arguing that such efforts are seen as elitist and disconnected from public sentiment. According to Greenwald, this rejection of media-driven narratives reflects a growing frustration with outlets that prioritize agenda over substance.

Michelle Obama's Persistent Negativity

Shifting focus around the 30:45 mark, Kelly and Greenwald address Michelle Obama's recent podcast episode, where she spends nearly an hour airing personal grievances. They describe her tone as consistently negative, particularly regarding her life and her relationship with Barack Obama. Kelly notes that this public display of dissatisfaction stands in stark contrast to the image often portrayed during their time in the White House. The discussion suggests that such revelations may alienate listeners who expect more positivity from a former First Lady.

Media Misinformation on Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Later in the episode, at roughly the 45:20 point, Will Chamberlain, senior counsel for The Article III Project, joins Kelly to discuss the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Chamberlain clarifies the facts surrounding Garcia, addressing media and leftist misinformation about his potential ties to MS-13, a notorious gang. He stresses the importance of accurate reporting on such matters, especially given the implications for public safety and immigration policy. Chamberlain also critiques the ongoing lawfare aimed at hindering deportation efforts under President Donald J. Trump's administration, viewing it as an obstacle to effective governance.

Support for Strong Immigration Policies

Chamberlain's commentary aligns with a broader support for the administration's focus on stringent immigration enforcement. He argues that addressing cases like Garcia's is crucial for maintaining law and order, a priority that resonates with many who value secure borders and community safety. This segment of the show underscores a commitment to policies that prioritize American citizens' well-being, reflecting the administration's stance under President Trump's leadership.

Broader Media Critique and Public Sentiment

Throughout the episode, Kelly and her guests weave a narrative of distrust in mainstream media, pointing to specific instances like the fawning Meghan Markle interview in Time Magazine, where she was labeled a 'founder' and 'innovator'—terms they find exaggerated. This critique, discussed near the 55:00 mark, reinforces their view that corporate media often prioritizes narrative over fact. The overall tone of the show suggests a public increasingly skeptical of such portrayals, turning instead to voices like Kelly's for unfiltered perspectives on current events.