Megyn Kelly Exposes Leftist Smears on Kamala Harris Critics as Racist

Megyn Kelly Tackles Leftist Narratives on Kamala Harris Criticism

Megyn Kelly, in a recent episode of her show posted on July 24, 2024, dives deep into the contentious narrative surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris. Joined by Tom Bevan, Carl Cannon, and Andrew Walworth of the RealClearPolitics Podcast, Kelly discusses the political landscape following Harris' emergence as the presumptive Democratic nominee. The conversation centers on whether Harris could outperform President Biden against Donald Trump in the upcoming election, the substantial funds her campaign has raised, and how her past record might impact swing voters. The panel also addresses the undemocratic process by which Harris was selected as the nominee, highlighting concerns over transparency and fairness in the Democratic Party's decision-making.

Tulsi Gabbard Critiques Harris' Policies and Past Performance

At around the 30-minute mark of the video, Tulsi Gabbard, author of 'For Love of Country,' joins Kelly to offer a scathing critique of Harris. Gabbard, who famously clashed with Harris during a 2019 Democratic primary debate, accuses the Democratic elite of misleading the public about the nomination process. She argues that Harris' policies lean toward extreme positions and suggests that her 2020 presidential run failed due to a lack of voter resonance. Gabbard also points out what she sees as Harris' push for lawlessness, including advocating for fewer police on the streets, a stance that could alienate many law-abiding citizens concerned with public safety. Her viral debate moment with Harris is revisited, underscoring past tensions and policy disagreements that continue to shape public perception.

Michael Knowles Challenges Media's Portrayal of Harris

Later in the episode, near the 1-hour mark, Michael Knowles of The Daily Wire joins the discussion to dissect the media's portrayal of Harris. Knowles criticizes attempts by the left and certain media outlets to rebrand Harris as 'cool' or 'brat,' a term he finds misplaced and indicative of a broader effort to mask her perceived awkwardness and lack of depth. He also addresses the swift labeling of Harris' critics as racist and sexist, calling out what he describes as false narratives designed to deflect legitimate criticism. Knowles highlights a specific incident involving Fox host Brian Kilmeade, where a misheard comment was spun into a controversy, illustrating the hypersensitivity surrounding discussions of Harris' record and candidacy.

Broader Implications for Political Discourse

The episode doesn't shy away from broader political implications, as Kelly and her guests explore how these narratives impact public discourse. The panel expresses concern over security lapses related to an assassination attempt, though specifics are not detailed in the discussion, reflecting a general unease about national safety under current leadership. Additionally, J.D. Vance's initial week as Vice Presidential nominee is touched upon, with the hosts noting the challenges he faces amidst a polarized political environment. The conversation underscores a deep frustration with what they see as manipulative tactics by the left to shield Harris from scrutiny, potentially undermining honest debate about her qualifications and policies.

A Call for Honest Evaluation of Leadership

Throughout the episode, Kelly maintains a focus on the need for an honest evaluation of political figures, regardless of partisan spin. The discussion with Gabbard and Knowles reinforces a perspective that values policy substance over crafted image, urging viewers to look beyond surface-level narratives. This episode serves as a reminder of the importance of holding leaders accountable, especially during critical election cycles. As Harris steps into the spotlight, Kelly and her guests emphasize that criticism rooted in policy and performance should not be dismissed as bias but rather engaged with as part of a healthy democratic process. The insights shared aim to equip viewers with a clearer understanding of the stakes involved, encouraging informed decision-making at the ballot box.