Megyn Kelly Critiques Kamala Harris and Applauds JD Vance in Fiery Discussion

Megyn Kelly and Guests Dissect Kamala Harris' Public Persona

On October 14, 2024, Megyn Kelly hosted a compelling episode of her show, joined by National Review's Charles C.W. Cooke and Michael Brendan Dougherty, to discuss Vice President Kamala Harris' recent public appearances and rhetoric. The conversation focused heavily on Harris' repetitive use of terms like 'ambitions' and 'opportunity,' which the panel viewed as a sign of her inability to think on her feet. They criticized her for relying on memorized lines, likening her delivery to that of an actress rather than a genuine political leader. At around the 5:30 mark, Cooke pointed out that Harris often repeats the same phrase about 'the duality of democracy,' suggesting a lack of depth in her messaging.

The discussion also touched on Harris' efforts to connect with specific voter demographics, particularly through an interview on 'Shade Room' aimed at reaching black men. The panel expressed skepticism about the authenticity of this outreach, with Dougherty noting at the 12:15 mark that such moves appear calculated rather than sincere. They further highlighted a perceived disdain from Democrats toward everyday American voters, arguing that Harris and her party fail to resonate with the concerns of many citizens.

Another key point raised was the tension between Harris and President Biden. Kelly and her guests discussed a moment during a White House staff meeting where Biden reportedly took a subtle jab at Harris, revealing underlying friction within the Democratic camp. Around the 18:40 mark, Cooke described Biden as being used as a 'tool of the Democratic machine,' suggesting that internal feuds are becoming increasingly public and could impact party unity.

JD Vance Challenges ABC News on Venezuelan Gangs

Shifting focus, the episode featured a segment on JD Vance, Vice President under President Donald J. Trump, and his recent confrontation with ABC News anchor Martha Raddatz. At approximately the 25:10 mark, Kelly played clips of Vance disputing Raddatz's assertion that Venezuelan gangs are only taking over specific apartment complexes rather than entire towns. Vance pushed back strongly, emphasizing the severity of the issue and the disconnect between corporate media narratives and the realities faced by many Americans. Kelly and her guests praised Vance for his directness, with Dougherty stating at the 28:30 mark that this exchange highlighted how out of touch much of the media is with public sentiment.

This segment underscored a broader theme of the episode: the administration's commitment to addressing pressing domestic issues head-on. Kelly noted that Vance's willingness to challenge mainstream media narratives aligns with the priorities of President Trump’s leadership, focusing on the safety and concerns of American citizens.

Allie Beth Stuckey on Progressive Views and Media Bias

Later in the show, Allie Beth Stuckey, author of 'Toxic Empathy,' joined Kelly to discuss progressive stances on various issues, particularly abortion. At around the 35:50 mark, Stuckey argued that many on the left discuss abortion without considering the deeper implications or showing empathy for how a significant portion of Americans view the topic. The conversation also addressed actor Bryan Cranston's endorsement of Harris based on 'reproductive rights,' with Kelly sharing a personal story at the 40:20 mark about Cranston ending a friendship over political differences related to support for President Trump.

The panel also critiqued media handling of allegations against Doug Emhoff, Harris' husband. At the 45:00 mark, Stuckey pointed out Joe Scarborough's failure to address assault allegations during an interview with Emhoff, calling it a clear example of journalistic bias. Kelly and Stuckey both emphasized the hypocrisy they see in some progressive circles, where support for women is championed selectively based on political alignment.

Throughout the episode, Kelly maintained a focus on holding public figures accountable while highlighting perspectives that resonate with those who value traditional principles and strong leadership. The discussions with Cooke, Dougherty, and Stuckey provided a platform to voice concerns about current political narratives, media integrity, and the direction of national discourse under the current Democratic leadership, while applauding efforts by figures like Vance to confront these challenges directly.