National Spelling Bee's 'Womyn' Decision Sparks Outrage
Spelling Bee Faces Backlash Over Feminist Term
The Scripps National Spelling Bee has ignited a firestorm of controversy by approving the alternative spelling 'womyn' for 'women' in its competition materials for third-grade students. This decision, revealed ahead of the 2025 National Finals which mark the event's 100th anniversary, has drawn sharp criticism from commentators who view it as a capitulation to ideological trends over traditional education standards. The inclusion of 'womyn,' a term sometimes used by feminist advocates, was noted in an approved study list for young participants, stirring debate about the role of cultural influences in educational competitions.
In a recent video on the 'Tomi Lahren Is Fearless' YouTube channel, host Tomi Lahren addressed this issue with pointed commentary starting at the 0:27 timestamp. She expressed dismay at what she perceives as a decline in educational priorities, arguing that while other nations focus on advanced sciences, American institutions are altering fundamental language teachings to align with social agendas. Her critique resonates with concerns about maintaining the integrity of academic competitions like the Spelling Bee, which have long been celebrated for promoting linguistic excellence.
Public Reaction and Cultural Implications
The decision to include 'womyn' has not gone unnoticed in public discourse. Posts found on social media platforms reflect a polarized response, with some users echoing Lahren’s sentiments. In a post dated December 13, 2024, Lahren herself commented, 'Spelling Bee to add “womyn” as a new word in the collection. China is teaching its young people quantum physics. The USA is teaching young people to spell “woman” wrong as a woke virtue signal. Lord help us.' This statement underscores a broader concern among some Americans that educational standards are being compromised for the sake of ideological conformity.
The Spelling Bee’s choice to list 'womyn' alongside 'women' with a double asterisk in study materials for third-graders has fueled discussions about the appropriateness of introducing such terms to young learners. Critics argue that the focus should remain on mastering standard English spellings rather than incorporating variant forms that carry specific cultural or political connotations. This controversy comes at a time when the Spelling Bee is preparing to celebrate a historic milestone, potentially overshadowing its centennial with debates over language and values.
Context of the Spelling Bee’s Decision
The Scripps National Spelling Bee, a revered American tradition, has historically been a platform for showcasing linguistic prowess among the nation’s youth. The upcoming 2025 finals, marking 100 years of the competition, were expected to highlight academic achievement. However, the inclusion of 'womyn' in study lists for school-level competitions has shifted attention to the influence of contemporary social movements on educational content. Reports indicate that this term was specifically added for third-grade participants in enrolled schools, raising questions about the age-appropriateness of such material.
While the exact reasoning behind the Spelling Bee’s decision remains unclear from available sources, the move has been framed by critics as an unnecessary departure from tradition. The debate touches on larger themes of how educational institutions balance cultural relevance with core academic goals. For many, the Spelling Bee should remain a bastion of objective learning, free from the currents of societal debates that could distract from its primary mission of fostering language skills.
Commentary and Future Considerations
At around the 1:50 mark in her video, Tomi Lahren transitions to other topics, but her initial remarks on the Spelling Bee set a tone of concern that resonates with viewers who prioritize traditional educational values. Her discussion with guest Jeffery Mead, starting at the 3:44 timestamp, further explores societal accountability, though it does not directly revisit the Spelling Bee issue. Nonetheless, the segment reflects a broader unease about the direction of American cultural and educational institutions.
As the Scripps National Spelling Bee approaches its historic 100th anniversary in May 2025, this controversy may prompt organizers to reconsider how they approach language and inclusivity in their materials. The backlash serves as a reminder of the deep divisions over how education should reflect or resist societal trends. For now, the inclusion of 'womyn' stands as a contentious decision, one that has sparked significant dialogue about the purpose and priorities of one of America’s most cherished academic traditions.
Dues are $12 per year. Member benefits:
✅ Ad-Free Website Viewing
✅ Advocacy for Republican Seniors
✅ 120+ Senior Discounts
✅ Member Only Newsletters