Obama Linked to Russiagate Hoax in Explosive New Documents

Uncovering the Russiagate Controversy with Tulsi Gabbard's Documents

In a revealing discussion on Megyn Kelly's show on July 22, 2025, journalist Matt Taibbi, editor of Racket News, dives into newly declassified documents released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. These documents shed light on alleged manipulations by Obama-era intelligence officials concerning Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Taibbi emphasizes the significance of a specific White House meeting on December 9, 2016, describing it as a pivotal moment that could be considered the 'smoking gun' in the Russiagate narrative. The discussion highlights how intelligence assessments reportedly shifted following directives from that meeting, raising questions about the integrity of the information presented to the public and President-elect Donald Trump at the time.

Taibbi points out that these documents suggest a coordinated effort between certain Obama administration officials and elements of the press to push forward narratives like the Steele dossier, which was initially dismissed by many until it gained traction through official channels. This segment, starting around the 5:30 mark, underscores a troubling pattern of information manipulation that Taibbi argues was designed to undermine the incoming administration of President Trump. The revelations are seen as a critical piece in understanding the origins of the Russiagate investigation and the political motivations behind it.

Obama's Role Under Scrutiny

As the conversation unfolds near the 15:45 mark, Taibbi elaborates on how these declassified files place former President Barack Obama at the center of the controversy. According to the documents discussed, intelligence officials altered their conclusions post the December 9 meeting, which Taibbi suggests was influenced by direct input from the Obama White House. This has led to renewed scrutiny over whether there was an intentional effort to skew intelligence to fit a particular narrative against President Trump before he even took office. Gabbard's decision to release these documents is framed as a bold move to expose what some see as a concerted effort to mislead the American public.

The discussion also touches on the broader implications of these findings for trust in governmental institutions. Taibbi notes that the apparent collusion between high-ranking officials and media outlets to elevate unverified claims has long-lasting effects on public confidence in both the press and intelligence communities. This segment of the video reinforces the importance of transparency and accountability in government actions, especially during politically charged times like a presidential transition.

Hunter Biden Sparks Democratic Party Tensions

Shifting focus around the 30:20 mark, Megyn Kelly welcomes Emily Jashinsky, host of 'After Party,' to discuss recent comments by Hunter Biden that have ignited internal conflict within the Democratic Party. Hunter Biden's candid and often profanity-laced interviews target prominent figures like George Clooney and the hosts of 'Pod Save America,' accusing them of hypocrisy and political opportunism. Jashinsky describes these outbursts as both revealing and divisive, pointing to underlying tensions within the party over leadership and direction following recent electoral disappointments.

Jashinsky highlights specific grievances Hunter Biden aired, including speculation about Clooney's motives for pushing President Joe Biden out of the 2024 race. This segment of the discussion paints a picture of a Democratic Party grappling with a civil war of sorts, as factions clash over past decisions and future strategies. The raw nature of Hunter Biden's commentary, while controversial, is seen as shedding light on personal and political frustrations that are rarely discussed so openly.

Cultural Commentary on Media Figures

Towards the latter part of the program, around the 45:10 mark, Kelly and Jashinsky pivot to critique prominent media and entertainment figures like Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, and Jennifer Lopez. They discuss Colbert's show cancellation despite significant financial losses, Stewart's attempts to recapture his past relevance with provocative rants, and Lopez's performances which they argue lack class and relevance. This portion of the conversation reflects broader cultural fatigue with outdated acts and personalities who struggle to adapt to changing audience tastes.

These critiques serve as a backdrop to the political discussions, illustrating a perceived decline in influence among once-dominant liberal voices in media. Jashinsky and Kelly's commentary suggests a shift in public sentiment, where traditional figures are increasingly seen as out of touch with current realities. This ties into the overarching theme of the video, which challenges established narratives and calls for accountability across political and cultural spheres.