Tim Walz Military Service Controversy: Veterans Speak Out on Stolen Valor

Veterans Criticize Tim Walz Over Military Service Claims

On September 2, 2024, Megyn Kelly hosted a discussion on her YouTube channel with four veterans who served alongside Minnesota Governor Tim Walz in the National Guard. These veterans, identified as Tom Behrends, Paul Herr, Tom Schilling, and Rodney Tow, raised serious concerns about Walz's military record, particularly his retirement timing and claims about his rank. Their discussion focused on allegations of 'stolen valor' and the impact of Walz's decisions on his unit, which deployed to Iraq shortly after his retirement.

The veterans expressed frustration over Walz's portrayal of his service, especially his assertion of being a retired command sergeant major. They clarified that Walz held this rank provisionally but did not complete the necessary requirements to retire with that title. This discrepancy, they argued, is disrespectful to those who have earned the rank through proper channels and extensive training.

Retirement Timing and Iraq Deployment Concerns

A significant point of contention was Walz's decision to retire just before his unit's deployment to Iraq in 2005. At around the 10:15 mark of the video, Tom Behrends emphasized that senior officers, including Walz, were informed of the impending deployment as early as fall 2004. This timeline suggests Walz was aware of the deployment well before filing to run for Congress, a decision the veterans believe influenced his retirement. They labeled his actions as abandoning his troops at a critical time, with terms like 'coward' and 'deserter' used to describe their perception of his choice.

The emotional weight of this decision was underscored by the loss of a 19-year-old soldier from Walz's unit during the Iraq deployment. The veterans highlighted this tragedy around the 45:30 point in the discussion, noting the personal impact on the unit and questioning Walz's leadership and commitment during such a pivotal moment.

Rank Misrepresentation and Public Statements

Another focal point was Walz's public statements about his military service. Around the 20:45 mark, Paul Herr pointed out that Walz has repeatedly referred to himself as a retired command sergeant major, a title the veterans assert he did not earn. They detailed the rigorous training and service requirements needed for this rank, which Walz did not fulfill upon retirement. This misrepresentation, they argued, is not just a personal slight but a broader issue of integrity, especially given Walz's political aspirations and potential role as vice president.

The veterans also took issue with comments Walz made that they felt denigrated the National Guard. At approximately the 30:10 mark, Tom Schilling referenced Walz's remark about '19-year-old cooks,' interpreting it as dismissive of the Guard's capabilities and contributions. They countered this by affirming the competence and dedication of National Guard members, challenging Walz's portrayal of their service.

Political Motivations and Leadership Questions

The discussion also touched on the political dimensions of Walz's military narrative. Around the 55:20 mark, Rodney Tow suggested that Walz's exaggerations of his service record might be politically motivated to enhance his image as a decorated veteran. The veterans questioned whether such actions reflect the character needed for someone potentially one heartbeat away from the presidency, emphasizing the importance of honesty and bravery in leadership roles.

They acknowledged the accusations of political motives behind their decision to speak out now, during Walz's vice-presidential candidacy. However, they maintained that their primary concern was to set the record straight about his service and retirement, arguing that these issues are relevant to his suitability for high office.

Broader Implications for Military Integrity

The veterans wrapped up their discussion by addressing the broader implications of Walz's actions on military integrity and public trust. They stressed that their critique was not about partisan politics but about ensuring accountability and respect for those who serve. Their firsthand accounts aimed to provide clarity on a controversy that has gained significant attention, especially as Walz's national profile has risen.

This conversation, hosted by Megyn Kelly, sheds light on a contentious aspect of Tim Walz's public persona. The veterans' detailed criticisms and personal experiences offer a perspective grounded in their shared service, raising important questions about leadership, honesty, and the responsibilities of those in public office.