Tulsi Gabbard Condemns Federal Surveillance as Political Intimidation

Tulsi Gabbard Speaks Out on Federal Surveillance

On May 21, 2025, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard appeared on 'The Ingraham Angle' to address disturbing reports of being surveilled by federal air marshals. Gabbard, who recently assumed her role under the Trump administration, expressed deep concern over what she described as a politically motivated effort to intimidate her. She linked the surveillance to her outspoken criticism of political figures, suggesting that her placement on the TSA's 'Quiet Skies' watchlist was not a random act but a deliberate attempt to silence dissent.

Gabbard detailed how whistleblowers from within the federal air marshal service came forward, revealing that they were instructed to monitor her movements on domestic flights. She emphasized the chilling effect such actions could have, not just on her, but on any American citizen who dares to challenge those in power. Her comments underscore a broader concern about the misuse of government resources to target individuals based on their political views.

Details of the 'Quiet Skies' Program

During the discussion, at around the 2:30 mark, Gabbard explained her understanding of the 'Quiet Skies' program, which is intended to monitor potential security threats on flights. However, she argued that her inclusion on this list had no basis in any credible threat assessment. Instead, she believes it was a direct response to her public statements and political stances, particularly those critical of certain administration figures prior to her current role.

The revelation of this surveillance has raised significant questions about privacy and the potential abuse of federal authority. Gabbard noted that the federal air marshals themselves were uncomfortable with their role in this operation, with some expressing disgust at being used as tools for what appeared to be a political agenda. This internal dissent, brought to light by whistleblowers, adds weight to her claims of improper targeting.

Support from Senator Rand Paul

Senator Rand Paul has also weighed in on the issue, confirming reports of Gabbard's surveillance by federal air marshals. In a statement released on May 20, 2025, Paul highlighted the dangers of unchecked government power, warning that if a high-profile figure like Gabbard can be targeted, ordinary citizens are even more vulnerable. His remarks align with Gabbard's concerns about the broader implications of such surveillance practices on personal freedoms.

Paul's involvement brings additional attention to the issue, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability within federal agencies like the TSA. His comments, echoed in various reports, suggest that this incident is part of a larger pattern of government overreach that must be addressed to protect constitutional rights.

Gabbard's Call for Accountability

Toward the latter part of the interview, near the 5:15 timestamp, Gabbard called for accountability and a thorough investigation into why she was placed under surveillance. She stressed that this was not an isolated incident but indicative of a systemic issue where government tools are weaponized against individuals for political reasons. Her position as Director of National Intelligence adds a layer of urgency to her call, given her direct oversight of intelligence operations.

Gabbard reiterated that her primary concern is the precedent this sets for other Americans. She argued that allowing such practices to continue unchecked undermines trust in government institutions and threatens the very freedoms that define the nation. Her resolve to address this issue from within her current role suggests that further scrutiny of surveillance programs may be forthcoming under her leadership.

Implications for Public Trust

The surveillance of Tulsi Gabbard has sparked a wider conversation about the balance between national security and individual rights. As a public figure now serving in a critical national security role, her experience highlights the potential for abuse within systems designed to protect citizens. The fact that federal air marshals were reportedly used in this manner raises serious ethical questions about the directives they receive and the oversight of such programs.

This incident, brought to public attention through Gabbard's interview and supported by statements from figures like Senator Rand Paul, serves as a reminder of the importance of vigilance in protecting personal liberties. As more details emerge, the focus remains on ensuring that government power is exercised responsibly and in alignment with the values of freedom and justice that are central to American life.